From eating a lot of squash, it's plain to me that with poor conditions or careless seed saving, pretty much all squash can become unpleasantly stringy. Spaghetti squash takes that unpleasant stringiness to a logical extreme, with the result that it is so bad, it's good. That's my theory anyway.
One of my big complaints about spaghetti squash: the ones I've grown in my own garden have been good (as have been, I think, farmers' market ones). The ones I buy at the grocery store have been so frequently poor that I don't even bother any more. By poor, I mean they are not super stringy, but have soft flesh interspersed with the strings, leading to a dish of mushy, stringy squash instead of something spaghetti-like. I do not know what makes the commercial ones so sucky. Poor quality seed source? Sub-optimal growing conditions? I'll say lack of educated consumer feed-back, for sure.
Because spaghetti squash exists at an extreme end of squash traits, I'm not sure it's ideal for the landrace idea. But obviously I think there is some room for improvement there, so worth playing around with it. I have never bothered trying to save seed as we grow so many pepos, and my impression of multi-crossed pepos is that they frequently revert to the lowest common denominator, otherwise known as lousy.